As more
Americans take advantage of genetic testing to pinpoint the makeup of their
DNA, the technology is coming head to head with the country’s deep-rooted
obsession with race and racial myths. This is perhaps no more true than for the
growing number of self-identified European Americans who learn they are
actually part African.
For those
who are surprised by their genetic heritage, the new information can often set
into motion a complicated recalibration of how they view their identity.
Nicole
Persley, who grew up in Nokesville, Va., was stunned to learn that she is part
African. Her youth could not have been whiter. In the 1970s and ’80s in her
rural home town, she went to school with farmers’ kids who listened to country
music and sometimes made racist jokes. She was, as she recalls, “basically
raised a Southern white girl.”
But as a
student at the University of Michigan: “My roommate was black. My friends were
black. I was dating a black man.” And they saw something different in her
facial features and hair.
“I was
constantly being asked, ‘What are you? What’s your ethnic background?’ ”
While
African Americans generally assume that they may carry non-African DNA dating
back to sexual relations between masters and slaves, many white Americans like
Persley grow up believing that their ancestry is fully European; a belief
manifested in things from kitschy “100 percent Irish” T-shirts to more-sinister
racial “purity” affiliations.
Now, for
under $100, it has become increasingly easy to spit into a vial and receive a
scientifically accurate assessment of one’s genetic makeup. Companies such as
23andMe and Ancestry.com provide a list of countries or regions where the
predominant genetic traits match those of one’s forebears. (There is no DNA
category for race, because a genetic marker for it does not exist).
In recent
years, multiracial Americans have increasingly entered the national
consciousness. Between 1970 and 2013, the portion of babies living with two
parents of different races rose from 1 percent to 10 percent, the Pew Research
Center found. From 2010 to 2016, those who identified as being of two or more
races grew by 24 percent, according to census data, a jump that could have had
as much to do with the changing way in which Americans identify themselves as
an actual increase in the racially mixed population.
But when the
mixing happened several generations back, it can take people by surprise. While
little data exists comparing people’s perceptions with the reality of their ethnic
makeup, a 2014 study of 23andMe customers found that around 5,200, or roughly
3.5 percent, of 148,789 self-identified European Americans had 1 percent or
more African ancestry, meaning they had a probable black ancestor going back
about seven generations or less.
The
discovery elicits a range of emotions. Given the fraught history of
slavery and racism, finding out that one is part African makes some people feel
vulnerable, even defensive, while others celebrate the discovery. At the DNA Discussion Project, an initiative at West Chester
University in Pennsylvania that surveys people about their perceptions of their
genetic makeup before and after DNA tests, 80 percent of the 3,000-odd people
they have surveyed self-identify as white. Of those, two-thirds see themselves
as of only one race, and they are more likely to be shocked and unhappy with
their test results than those who identify as mixed or other races, according
to a peer-reviewed paper conducted by the project.
But for
some, white identity trumps DNA. If the test result is too disruptive to their
sense of self, they may rationalize it away. One white supremacist who
discovered he had African DNA claimed on the white nationalist website
Stormfront.com that the testing company was part of a Jewish conspiracy to
“defame, confuse and deracinate young whites on a mass level.” Members of white
nationalist groups have advised those who discover non-Aryan heritage to rely
more on genealogy or the “mirror test,” as quoted in a sociological study of Stormfront members discussing ancestry-test results.
(“When you look in the mirror, do you see a Jew, or a Black? If not, you’re
good,” one commenter wrote).
“For me, the
number one takeaway is how easily people reject science,” said Anita Foeman, a
professor of communication studies who co-directs the DNA Discussion Project,
whose respondents are mostly in and around Philadelphia. (In a sample of 217
self-identified European Americans from the project, 22 percent learned that
they had African DNA).
“Many whites
would get a new story and say, ‘I’m still going to call myself ‘white,’ or ‘I’m
still going to call myself ‘Italian,’” Foeman said. “They started to less see
race as genetic and more a question of culture and physical appearance.”
The project
found certain groups, younger people and families, for example, to be more open
to the news. “Women just tend to be more flexible in terms of racial
identification,” Foeman said.
Reassessing
the past
In an era
when technology is partly blamed for an increased sense of polarization,
it is perhaps ironic that a technological advance is helping to blow up some of
that. And because users can connect with relatives on the DNA registries, some
white test-takers have been fascinated to find fourth or fifth cousins who are
black.
The test
results can present an intriguing puzzle. When a significant amount of African
DNA shows up in a presumably white person, “there’s usually a story, either a
parent moved away or a grandparent died young,” said Angela Trammel, an
investigative genealogist in the Washington area. “Usually a story of mystery,
disappearance; something.”
For Persley,
46, the link turned out to be her grandfather, who had moved away from his
native Georgia, and started a new life passing as white in Michigan. He married
a white woman, who bore Persley’s father.
But in
researching her genealogy after college, Persley discovered that her
grandfather’s brother, her great-uncle, continued to identify as African
American back in Macon and became a celebrated architect. A recent genetic test
confirmed that Persley’s DNA is around 8 percent African.
“That was a
bombshell revelation for me and my family,” said Persley, now an artist and
real estate investor in Boca Raton, Fla. She doubts her father knew. “My father
had already passed away, so I could not ask him. It would have been, I think, a
very difficult conversation to have with him, and I don’t think he would have
been pleased. I’m absolutely proud of my
genealogy and my heritage, but I think my father would have thought I was
dishonoring his father, because it was a secret and I dug it up.”
Her mother
was flabbergasted.
“Her jaw
dropped,” Persley said, “and she said, ‘Oh my gosh, I was married to a black
man and I didn’t even know it!’”
Persley now
recalls hints in her father, his laugh, his mannerisms, that reminded her of
black friends and make her sad about connections that were lost.
“To me,
that’s the real tragedy of it,” she said. “His father had to completely
reinvent himself and cut everyone in his family off, and that’s so tragic.”
For Brendan
Lordan, 18, of Wallingford, Pa., the test also helped fill in missing family
lore. He grew up believing that he was German and Irish, and had known about
all his relatives, except for a great-great-grandmother.
“Nobody knew
her name or who she was,” Lordan said. She had had three sons, but they were
taken away from her as infants. “When she was on her deathbed, one of them was
allowed to go in and talk to her for a few minutes; but only with the light
off.”
The family
assumed it was because she was socially inferior to the boys’ father; perhaps a
prostitute. But when Lordan’s DNA test came back 4 percent African, another
narrative emerged; that she was black, but her sons had been light enough to
pass as white.
Hope in a
vial
Comparing
his test results to the family history made the fair-skinned Lordan reconsider
his assumptions.
“The rule in
the Old South was a drop of African blood makes you African,” he said. But now
that the drops can be measured, “it sort of made race seem a lot more
arbitrary. You’d never think I had African heritage just by looking at me. It’s sort of made me disregard race more.”
Still, those
drops have had a potent effect on people’s identities. For some whites,
even a smidgen of African ancestry was commonly referred to as “the taint,”
said Harvard University African and African American studies professor Henry
Louis Gates Jr. “That said it all; that it was something to be ashamed of,
something dark and dirty.”
Gates, whose
PBS show “Finding Your Roots” helped actor Ty Burrell and singer Carly Simon
discover that they had African ancestry, said he hopes that mounting awareness
of the complexity of DNA will help lead to greater understanding across racial
and ethnic lines.
“One of the
pleasures I get from doing ‘Finding Your Roots’ is to show that we’re all mixed
and that for 50,000 years everybody’s been sleeping with everybody, and that
makes me blissfully happy, because my enemy is racism,” he said.
Often,
African DNA is hard to source. Lisa Gross, 55, a sixth or seventh generation
Kentuckian, grew up hearing she had Native American ancestry; a common
narrative for families with unexplained dark complexions. So, in 2014, she
mailed in her saliva sample to find out.
The results
showed her to be mostly European, but while there was a trace of Native
American DNA, “the biggest surprise was that I have a significant amount of
Sub-Saharan markers,” she said. “I was thrilled. I thought, ‘Wow. Where’s that?
Where did that come from?’ It’s someone within the last 10 generations. That
would go back to about 1600.”
Gross’s
relatives came to the New World in the mid-1700s, so the African DNA
contribution may have happened in Europe, she said.
“In the
best-case scenario, it’s someone who is not in servitude, who was not a slave,”
she said. “It’s a free person who enters into the relationship of their own
free will, who is not coerced, who is not commanded. That is what I hope. But
history tells us that that is probably not the case.”
As DNA tests
become more commonplace, Foeman hopes that they will help shift the cultural
paradigm. “We are living at a time when people think they have to stick in
their camps, but I think people are getting exhausted by that,” she said. “It’s
an opportunity for us to reboot the conversation about race.”
For Persley,
it did.
“I felt kind
of like a spy because if I was in a group of white people and they were
throwing around the n-word or racist jokes, I felt like I couldn’t idly stand
by anymore,” Persley said. “I became kind of an activist. I’d say, ‘Don’t talk
like that around me. It offends me. Stop.’”
Gross, too,
said that the discovery made her realize how artificial some cultural
narratives can be.
“In this day
and time,” she said, “I think that we need to be open to these experiences, and
when you think about the concept of race and ‘I’m 100 percent this,’ it’s
almost laughable.”
Tara Bahrampour
The Washington Post
2-7-18
No comments:
Post a Comment