Friday, June 30, 2017

THE BODY OF CHRIST


The year was 1968, and I was a student at one of several denominational bible colleges; in central Florida.

I was enrolled in a New Testament class, and my professor was a light-hearted English woman named Ruth Breush; (who interestingly enough was married to a light-hearted Australian man named Percy Breush).

If I live to be a 103 I will never forget one day in particular. Mrs. Breush began the class with, to say the least, an unusual story.

“Last night I had a dream. In the dream I was somehow transported to heaven. And I stood beneath the throne of none other than our Lord Jesus Christ.

His brown eyes were piercing to behold. Every strand of His auburn hair was in place. His countenance was radiant. And then,

… then I looked downward.

And what I saw horrified me. For you see, His chest was sunken. His arms were emaciated. Every rib shown through His parchment skin.

And then it occurred to me.

… The Body of Christ.

While the Head is fine and wonderful to behold, thank you, the Body is unhealthy, and in need of attention.”

Christ’ Body. His believers on earth, at least a great many of them, leave much to be desired.

Fickleness, In-fighting, Temptations, Immaturity, Abject Sin.

As scripture reminds us. “These things ought not to be.”

I have often wondered if I am, by chance, my professor’s last surviving student who has recalled and passed on this story to the generation who will follow after me.

If so, I count it a distinct calling, honor and responsibility to do so.


William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 25. Copyright Pending.

If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
********
Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.

THE LONE BLACK MAN STANDING UNDER A TREE


I have written about this particular topic in the past, but have felt inclined to write about it again.

There is an old family photograph, circa 1915, which depicts my great Grandfather John, his wife Caroline, my Grandfather Webster, and the remainder of his siblings standing in front of their old Georgia homestead. No doubt many families throughout America own similar black and white photos from this time period,

... with one exception.

On the far right of the picture we notice a lone black man standing under a non-descript tree.

Of course, during this time period, and for years afterward, whites would "not think about" having a photograph made in close proximity with a black person. Nor for that matter did whites and blacks attend the same schools or churches, or frequent the same restaurants and hotels.

(It was only in the mid 60's, when I was a sophomore, that our high school began the process of integration; when a few black students were moved from Union Academy to Summerlin Institute. Thankfully, there wasn't a hint of trouble in old Bartow, Florida, as seemed so common in other southern states of that era).

A Lone Black Man Standing Under a Tree.

In biblical times newly released slaves, who wished to remain with the family, submitted to a ceremony in which an awl was driven through his or her ear, as a symbol of their momentous decision.

Oral tradition tells us that the sixty-some year old man in the picture was the former slave of John's father, William, and who, after the Civil War, chose to remain on the land as a sharecropper.

Now, I don't have a clue how well "Martin" was treated as a slave, but of course I like to think his decision to remain with the family is a good indicator of that treatment.

To be sure there never has been, is not now, nor ever will be any excuse for the practice of slavery. Far too many of my ancestors owned slaves, (and of course, I regret it).

Well after the Civil War, and only in the lifetime of John's and Webster's grandchildren, and the involvement of such men as Martin Luther King Jr. has significant change occurred.

A tribute to the lone black man under the tree.



  1.  William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 18. Copyright 2015.

    If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
    ********
    Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

    Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

    Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.

Thursday, June 29, 2017

I WISH YOU ENOUGH


I wish you enough sun to keep your attitude bright no matter how grey the day may appear.

I wish you just enough rain to appreciate the sun even more.

I wish you enough happiness to keep your spirit alive and everlasting.

I wish you just enough pain so that even the smallest of joys in life may appear bigger.

I wish you enough gain to satisfy your wanting.

I wish you just enough loss to appreciate all that you possess.

I wish you enough hellos to get you through the final good-bye.

Wednesday, June 28, 2017

FEET IN THE IVY. EYES IN THE CLOUDS. Pts. 1-5


‘Til recently, my neighbor, Frank, fed a feral cat which “had taken up” at his house several years before. “Buddy” was a beautiful yellow ‘tabby’ type cat which, Frank once informed me, had been the ward of a family whose house was just down the block. At some point, however, the afore-mentioned family had either moved away, or allowed Frank to adopt him.

To be sure, while Buddy lived outside, his demeanor was that of an indoor cat. While he came and went as he liked, he was altogether docile and allowed anyone and everyone to stroke his fur or pat his head. More than once I have seen the friendly feline standing on the edge of my garden wishing well, and bending over the shallow pool to take a drink. I inherited the little ceramic pond from my late neighbor, and absolutely love the stained-glass mosaic in the bottom. While I had considered leaving the little pool empty, my concern for Buddy and the other feral cats of my neighborhood have caused me to regularly fill it with water, and frequently change it out.

It goes without saying. Frank and everyone else in the neighborhood “thought a lot” of Buddy the Cat, and when he strayed into this or that person’s yard, he or she would take time out of his or her day to pet the precious critter, and humor him with baby talk.

Simply put, Buddy became a fixture of our little community. He loved to sit on a nearby utility box, and wile away the daylight hours. And sometimes, in the wee hours of the morning, as I closed the door behind me, and began my twilight trek, he’d be lounging on the hood of Frank’s old truck.

And so it goes. And so it went for the longest time.

And then, a couple of months ago, I had stepped outside to engage my little pooch, Queenie, in her daily sabbatical, and had walked a couple hundred yards down Shadow Wood Lane, when a car pulled up alongside, and slowed to a stop.
Pt. 2

A thirty-something year old brunette sat behind the wheel.

She spoke.

“Hi. I’m Marta. Have you seen a big gray and white cat in this neighborhood?”

(and)

“His name is “Gabby” and he’s blind.”

And it immediately occurred to me that if I’d seen a big gray and white blind cat recently, I would have little or no trouble remembering the experience.

I responded.

“Uh, no ma’am. I haven’t seen a cat fitting that description. I’m very sorry you lost him.”

(and)

“I hope you find Gabby.”

(and)

“I love animals too. I’ll certainly be on the look out.”

With this, the stranger thanked me, and drove away.

And as I watched her go, I thought,

“I doubt I’ll ever see Marta again, much less her cat, Gabby.”

Sensitive as I am, I could not help but reflect on how difficult it would be for a blind cat in the wild, and the rudimentary emotions it must be feeling all alone in a foreign environment.

Did I mention how dubious I was that I’d ever see the lady again, and how I thought there was a miniscule chance of running up with her cat?

(Yep. I thought so).

Well, my dear readers, I was only half right.
Pt. 3


For as it fell together, I did indeed see that young lady again; and all of eight or ten minutes later.

But I’m getting ahead of myself.

As I was walking my little Queenie that day, (and subsequent to my conversation with “Marta”) a fellow jogged past, and exclaimed,

“Do you have a baggie for that pooch?”

(and)

“I see you don’t have a pooper scooper.”

(and)

 “Don’t you know you’re supposed to pick up after your dog?”

And I responded with,

“Listen here, fella. This is the neighborhood dog walk.”

(and)

“We’re in the county out here, and there’s no rules about retrieving dog scat in our neighborhood.”

(and)

“Nobody picks up after their dogs on this pathway.”

(and)

“Don’t bother me with crap like that.” (Play on words).

All of which is superfluous to my story, but I thought you might enjoy the proverbial color.

At any rate, as Queenie and I neared the house, I was met with one of the strangest scenarios to which I have ever been exposed.

Pt. 4

As I gazed towards Frank’s house, I noticed my newfound friend’s car parked in the street adjacent to his house. And it was about this time I noticed Marta sitting under my neighbor’s water oak tree, in the center of his ivy garden, holding Buddy, the cat in her lap; while stroking his back and singing a rather ethereal tune.

And I thought, “Well, ain’t that a sight?”

(and)

“Exactly what kinda nut do we have here?”

I mean, I knew “from the get go” that the lady loved cats, but to pull up next to a stranger’s yard, get out, step into the middle of his ivy garden, detain his cat, and sit down and begin to sing to him, well now…

all I can say is, that’s ‘rich.’

I suppose Marta sat under the expansive oak tree holding Frank’s little Buddy for all of fifteen minutes, and finally set the cat down next to the bird feeder, stood up and retraced her steps to her car. And as she made her way to her vehicle, I noticed she looked over her right shoulder, and exchanged a final aloha with the cat. (Well, to be sure I never heard so much as a ‘meow’ from the cat, but I have to believe that he enjoyed every moment of their rural interlude).

I can only wonder whether Frank or his wife, Linda happened to look out their bay window while all this tender compassion was “going on” and how they may have processed what was happening in the middle of their ivy garden.

Pt. 5

Fast forward six weeks, and as I stepped out of my front door and walked the fifty feet to my mailbox, I noticed Frank in his front yard. (To say that my neighbor enjoys doing lawn and scrub care would be like saying Jesse Owens liked jogging).

As I reached my mailbox, and offered my well-worn greeting, (“Hey Frank”)! he looked up from raking in some mulch along the margins of his driveway, and said,

“Hi Bill. Did you know we lost Buddy last night?”

(and)

“I came out to get the newspaper, and found him lying dead next to my old truck.”

Well, I was shocked since I’d grown to like that personable old feline, and he seemed so much healthier than an ancient black cat which had limped around the neighborhood for time immemorial; and though wounded and arthritic has continued to keep on keeping on.

Of course, I offered my sincere regrets, and expressed how sorry I was that Buddy had gone on to his natural reward.

And as I retrieved my mail, and began the short trek back to my house, I my gaze fell onto that huge water oak tree in Frank’s front yard, and the ivy which grew beneath it.

And it was then that I recalled a recent day when a young lady named Marta sat beneath that tree, her feet in the ivy, her eyes in the clouds, and while her nimble hands played along the back of a docile tabby feline.

And, in retrospect, I think Marta’s impromptu little commune with Buddy the Cat was almost prophetic, as though some ethereal siren call had bidden she stop, and offer some final tribute to the furry critter.

They say we ought to give our flowers to those who are still able to smell them, and offer our parting words to those who still abide in the land of the living.



I think that’s what Marta was about that day.


William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 60. Copyright 2015.

If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
********
Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.




















Tuesday, June 27, 2017

A SLIGHT CHANGE IN HIS AGENDA. Pts. 1-5


Just when you get used to living and begin to take life for granted, it seems like someone near and dear realizes the most profound of all human experiences.

Thankfully, the majority of those who leave us have reached the average age at which, well, the majority of people leave us. As I approach the (depending on how you perceive it) enviable or unenviable age of 70, I have navigated the passing of close friends, cousins, aunts and uncles, in-laws, grandparents, parents in law, and parents. And as I have previously alluded, save for a minority of these folks, most had lived out what is generally considered a “long and good life.”

However, there are exceptions to the rule, and these exceptions span the genders, races, cultures, national origins, and ages from 0 to 60.

One of the first and most poignant examples in my own life involved a dear classmate named, “Beth;” the daughter of a local music minister and his wife. And though I don’t recall ever exchanging a word with her, she and I were members of the Summerlin High School Chorus, and, thanks to the expertise of an extraordinary choir director, were fortunate to compete in several state contests together. Dear Beth was taken before her time, at least in terms of our human understanding, as the result of a one vehicle accident; just a few months after my graduation, and just weeks before her own.

In the past few years I have had the distinct privilege of knowing a dear couple, also ministers of the Gospel, who have experienced, in all respects, an almost identical tragedy.

Pt. 2

And when such hideous, seemingly premature events occur, we are left with little more than question marks, and limited options. We can rage against the seeming whims of Providence, (or) invest our questions in the One who will, someday, if not now, be faithful to provide a relevant response.

Speaking of the unexpected homegoing of the youngest and dearest among us, following is a tribute written over a century ago, by the teacher of my dearly departed great uncle; who passed away prior to attaining his 20th year of life.

No doubt, I am biased, but it has to be the most beautiful eulogy I have ever read.


Whom the Gods love, die young was said of yore.

This morning our town is shrouded in profound gloom. A guest has visited one of our homes, a guest unbid, who, armed with resistless power, remained without a welcome from his host. For nine long days, this guest loitered around the room with lawless freedom, and at night, would stalk into the room, and cast his shadows on the walls. At last he grew more familiar, and bending lowly over the couch, called the noble, generous spirit of Cleveland to the God, who gave it.

There is something exquisitely touching in the tolling of a church bell amid the silence of quiet country folks. The plowman stops his horse to listen to the solemn tidings of mortality. The sympathizing mothers forget their work, and with the needle suspended tremulously over the garment before them, give a deep sigh, and wonder who it is that is gone to his long home. And the innocent children, cheerful as their glee, and merry as their songs, pause amid their merry gambols and catch the melancholy sound and cover their little heads when they go to bed at night. And this is death.

If a man die, shall he live again? Yes, and more abundantly.

Cleveland died at the approach of morning, just as the stars were fading away, one by one, from the gray heavens, and night had slowly receded before the approach of golden morn. It was one of the loveliest customs of the ancients to bury their young at early morning twilight.

They gave a soft interpretation to death, believing that Aurora, the goddess of light, who loved the young, took them to her soft embrace, and forever looked after their happiness. Better for us, that we should think more of the happiness and beauties of Heaven, than have such fearful concern about that other place. Is there anyone so faithless as to believe that God will not provide for those for whom his Son died!

I believe that my young friend, Cleveland, is safe in the embrace of a loving Savior. He left this life just as he was merging into the prime of manhood. He was the son of Mr. and Mrs. Warren Cone of this place. He was a pupil of the Barwick school, and be it said to his credit, that during two terms, he never had to be corrected. He knew his duty and always did it.

(A tribute to Grover Cleveland Cone by his teacher, B.H. Culbreth)

Pt. 3

In the past several days, the dark angel left his calling card with yet another young family member, my nephew; (and the double great nephew of the individual of whom the foregoing eulogy was written).

Tony and I have enjoyed a good relationship from time immemorial, and have remained in touch and have “broken bread together.” And, as a result, it was all the more startling to discover he was no longer among the land of the living.

But to digress for a moment.

Tony had not been well for quite some time; though I was not familiar with the significance of his symptoms. It was only after his passing that I discovered my 35 year old nephew had experienced a couple of small strokes in recent years, had contended with bouts of anxiety, and that doctors had been unsuccessful in treating his hypertension. As a result, his wherewithal to procure work was limited; not the least of which reason was his inability to pass the physical exams to which he’d been required to submit.

Tony had friends and lots of them, and a smile that would “light up all out doors.” And having known some difficult times and seasons, he was an empathetic soul and would “give you the shirt off his back.” I don’t recall him ever asking me for anything, (other than a small portion of his grandfather’s ashes) and I loved to hear his intonations of my name and title. (“Uncle Royce…”)

Tony and I were planning to have lunch together this past weekend, and we’d decided to “pick up a bite” at our local “Cracker Barrel Restaurant.” As a result, I dropped him a message the Friday morning before our scheduled Saturday meal, and said,

“Well, are we on for tomorrow at Cracker Barrel?” Oddly enough, hours elapsed and I received no response.

I later understood he’d been unable to respond, but rather had crossed the proverbial Jordan; while awaiting his mother’s knock on the door.

Pt. 4

That same afternoon my brother called, and invaded my sanctum with the most unbelievable news. Tony had passed away at home. It seems he’d called his mother in the wee hours of the morning; while she was in the midst of performing her duties as a nurse to a disabled child. Linda urged him to go to the E.R., but he hesitated to follow through. He disliked hospitals, and the anxiety to which he was prone exaggerated his emotions towards the medical environment, and medical population which inhabited it.

After getting off work and stopping by her house, my sister made the most fateful journey of her life. When Tony failed to answer her knock, she entered his mobile home and discovered his lifeless form. Though unresponsive, and his natural warmth was gone, Linda exhausted what options remained to her. I will spare you the details.

My nephew loved his grandparents like few grandchildren ever loved their grandparents, and had created a small self-styled memorial table upon which he kept their photos and personal mementos. Oddly enough, after his mother had done all she was capable of doing, and subsequent to calling the paramedics, she glanced towards the table, and discovered Tony’s old work badge lying amongst the other pictures and trinkets; as though the result of some premonition, he’d added that small tribute to himself.

And as we later learned, Tony had contacted a friend that morning, and expressed how badly he felt; and that he thought he might not make it through the day. And as you might expect, his family and friends understood his ‘gift’ for exaggeration, and it is likely that the young man shrugged it off, and “went about his business.”

In retrospect, my sister remembered a recent conversation in which Tony elicited a particular promise, preceding their discussion with,

…“Just in case something were to happen to me.”

Odd, the confluence of ingredients which combined to enhance the ‘flavor” of that ethereal mixture which represents my nephew’s passing; to some of which I have previously alluded.
Pt. 5


And while I was convinced of it, I had to be sure. Sitting down at my personal computer, and bringing up the internet, I clicked on the only social media page to which I subscribe, and scanned through a recent interaction with my nephew.

There it was “in all its glory.”

“Uncle Royce, I would never harm myself, but I would love to go be with Granddaddy and Grandmama.”

Tony and I were scheduled to have lunch together the next day. However, my nephew had experienced a slight change in his agenda. He’d traded a few morsels of turkey and mashed potatoes, and the natural comradery we’d so often shared for something, (no offense intended) that he’d so much preferred taking part.

I have no doubt, whatever, that as I write these lines and you read my musings that Tony is healthier and happier than he ever was before, and that he now resides in a place devoid of those dark dreams which so often overwhelmed the night season, and stole away his sleep.

“I can only imagine.” (My mother’s favorite song, and one she hoped would be sung at her funeral).

But I can only imagine…

I can so easily visualize it.

As Tony drifted off on this side of the proverbial curtain, and the rest which had eluded him for so long overwhelmed his sensibilities, and his personal angel gently ushered him through the pearly gates,

…he recognized two familiar figures.

And I am privileged to be momentarily privy to their reunion and lively banter.

His grandmother almost involuntarily rubs her eyes in disbelief, and his granddad exclaims,

“Tony! What are you doing here? I could have swore you would have been another fifty years coming! But don’t get me wrong, you gotta know we’re glad to see you, boy!”

To which Tony responds,

“Well, grandpa, I suppose I had a slight change in my agenda.”

And with this, his granddad issues a personal invitation.

“Are you hungry, son? I can tell you. The food here is better than anything you ever sunk your teeth into. Can you smell it? I just happened by the kitchen, and the angels are cooking up the best BBQ pork, and fried chicken, and creamed corn, and fried green tomatoes, and cornbread that ever passed your lips!”

And as that heavenly scene begins to evaporate, (at least to my mortal eyes) Tony’s grandfather and grandmother grab his hands, one on the left, one on the right, and follow a well-worn golden pathway towards that lovely aroma which wafts from the heavenly banquet hall.



“Uncle Royce, no offense to you, but I would love to have lunch with Granddaddy and Grandmama.”

No offense taken, Tony. No offense taken.


William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 60. Copyright Pending.

If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
********
Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.



THE PROFESSION OF REV. D. JAMES KENNEDY

"Now I know that someday I am going to come to what some people will say is the end of this life. They will probably put me in a box and roll me right down here in front of the church, and some people will gather around and a few people will cry.

But I have told them not to do that because I don't want them to cry. I want them to begin the service with the Doxology and end with the Hallelujah Chorus because I am not going to be there, and I am not going to be dead.

I will be ...more alive than I have ever been in my life, and I will be looking down on you poor people who are still in the land of the dying and have not yet joined me in the land of the living. And I will be more alive for evermore, in greater health and vitality and joy than ever; ever I or anyone has known before."

(Dr. D. James Kennedy)

Sunday, June 25, 2017

HEDY LAMARR'S OTHER LIFE

Known as “the most beautiful woman in the world,” Hollywood actress Hedy Lamarr starred in dozens of films over a career that spanned decades.
But there was more to Lamarr than met the eye. An avid inventor, she worked on everything from a tablet that, when dropped into water, fizzed into instant cola, to frequency hopping — a World War II-era secure communications technology that’s used today in wireless internet, GPS and cellphones.
More and more, Lamarr, who died in Florida in 2000, is posthumously becoming regarded as the "mother of Wi-Fi."
During her years as a film star, little was known of Lamarr’s offscreen career. But in a narrative twist, Hollywood is finally taking notice: A new documentary, “Bombshell: The Hedy Lamarr Story,” premiered at this year’s Tribeca Film Festival, and a TV miniseries is in the works.
“All of a sudden, there’s this appetite in Hollywood [for] making stories that seemed impossible to crack, because clearly there’s a hunger for it there,” says actress Diane Kruger, who narrated “Bombshell” and is working on the new television series. She credits the film industry’s increased enthusiasm in part to the success of “Hidden Figures,” last year’s hit about other brilliant women in science.
“But then for Hedy in particular, what’s been difficult is that her story is so big, and it spans five decades. You want to tell all of it because, yes, she was an inventor, but she was also a brilliant woman and a great actress. And so you need the time to tell her story, and … it’s kind of a hard nut to crack.”
Kruger first heard about Lamarr’s moonlight career from Richard Rhodes, who pieced her story together in his 2011 biography, “Hedy’s Folly: The Life and Breakthrough Inventions of Hedy Lamarr.”
“What attracted me most to her was that she already had this incredible life,” Kruger says, “coming over to the US from Austria, escaping the war, convincing Louis B. Mayer on a boat to the US to hire her as an actress, and then in her spare time — as a nontrained engineer — coming up with frequency hopping. I just found myself completely enthralled by her story.”
According to Rhodes, the Austrian-born Lamarr grew up in Vienna with “a kind of debutante’s education.” But he explains that her father, a bank director, was interested in science and technology, and often walked with her around the city, pointing out what made things work. “So, she had a … background that she associated with a much-beloved father,” he says.
Lamarr’s informal scientific training continued when, as a teenager in 1933, she married a wealthy arms merchant who worked with the German and Italian military. “Once again, as a kind of armpiece at dinner, when all of these generals and admirals were coming around, she listened and absorbed and learned,” Rhodes says.
The marriage didn’t last, and Lamarr set out to kindle her acting career. “When she then got to Hollywood in the 1930s and began inventing on her own, she added to her skills,” Rhodes says. Once there, Lamarr watched World War II unfold with growing concern. “She was Austrian, so technically an enemy alien.”
“Her country was attacking British shipping in particular and torpedoed ships loaded with children who were being moved from England to Canada to escape the German bombing of London and of the country. That horrified her, and it was then that she began thinking how she might be of help.”
In Hollywood, Lamarr fell in with the artistic “it” crowd. “She used to play chess with Man Ray, the American photographer who was part of the whole Surrealist movement in Paris in the '20s,” Rhodes says.
At one dinner party, Lamarr met George Antheil, the avant-garde composer who would become her collaborator on the frequency-hopping technology. Together, they devised a system that used rolls of perforated paper — like the ones in player pianos — to quickly switch between frequencies, making it harder for the enemy to jam signals on radio-guided weapons.
“They needed a way to change the frequencies automatically, and they worked out a way to have a scroll on the plane, like a miniature piano roll, and an equally timed scroll on a torpedo, which would flip the frequency from one point to another with little holes in the scroll just like the ones on a piano roll,” Rhodes says. “It was a very clever use of the existing technology, because digital technologies had not yet, of course, come along.”
Lamarr and Antheil passed their technology on to the United States Navy, which did little with it during the war. It wasn’t until 1997, three years before her death, that Lamarr received professional acknowledgment for her invention.
“As she grew older, I think she was very bitter,” Kruger says. “You know, Hollywood turned [its] back on her because now she wasn’t young and beautiful anymore, and she was trying to keep that facade up but clearly couldn’t. And nobody ever valued her for her mind, so she became a recluse from her own family.
“It’s a sad story, and at the same time, I think it’s a wonderful story that she was alive when she was finally recognized for it,” Kruger says. “But she never, for example, made any money from it.”
Nevertheless, Kruger — who wants to begin her miniseries by depicting Lamarr as a teenager — thinks the actress’s story can inspire others.
“For me, it is really about encouraging young people, and especially young women, to go into fields that are traditionally male-oriented, and to not judge a book by its covers,” she says. “I also think that the father-daughter relationship is something that I find myself, as a girl, really interested in.
“And, you know, anything is possible if you have a curious mind, and you think outside the box.”

This article is based on an interview that aired on PRI's Science Friday.

Saturday, June 24, 2017

THE TALE OF THREE MEN


My father founded an exterminating company in the small town of Bartow, Florida in the second half of this past century, and by the time he retired in the early 90’s I think he’d terminated every ant, roach, termite and rat for 500 square miles. And in so doing became fast friends with their intolerant caretakers.

My dad was one of those characters you never forget, and whose name lives on in the community which he loved and in which he served. More times than I care to recount strangers have told me,

“Your last name is familiar. Are you Henry McDonald’s son?”

(or)

“I knew a fella once with that name. He was my exterminator for years. We wouldn’t have used anyone else to kill our bugs.”

(or)

“Your dad was always fair and square with me. And he was quite a guy all around.”

To which I have often simply responded,

“You know he’s gone now. He was a good father. And we miss him.”

Speaking of those who have gone on to their reward, I attended a memorial service today for a man named Roger whom I never had the pleasure of knowing. And if it seems strange that I would attend a service for someone I didn’t know, it may be important to mention that I know his brother.

I suppose Bob worked for my dad for “a good” twenty years, and to say he performed his job adequately would have been an understatement. And thus with anyone who procures a position in a private company, and gives as good as they get, and more, with time Bob gained my father’s comradery and respect, and yes, even

… the love of a father.
And so you might not think it strange that during the course of his employment Bob made it clear that when my father was ready to retire, he would very much like to purchase, “McDonald Exterminators.” Upon which, they’d shared a handshake, (and perhaps a frosty mug, as well).


Of course, any of my father’s four children might well have carried on in his name, (as did the daughter of his own sister; who was his closest competitor in the trade). But each of us had our own plans, and it seems none of those plans included insecticide, and the myriad of dead six legged creatures which are the result of a liberal application of such stuff. (The closest I ever came to any mild interest in the business was in my unique ability to sketch the American Cockroach. I recall it with a smile now, but I once entered one of my realistic drawings in a local art contest and won a blue ribbon).

But as the years increased like sand in the proverbial hour glass, and my dad set a date to “do the deed,” he fulfilled his promise to Bob to tender the business to him at, (as I recall) a less than fair market price. And given the good he’d done my dad, the value his name and work ethic had lent to the business, and the relationship they’d established, it was only well and proper for my father to do so.

And my own love and respect for Bob is such that as I was writing a condolence card for him, and his wife, Joanna, the other day it occurred to me to add a bit of cursive to the all-too formal pre-printed acknowledgments;

(which went something like…)

“Bob, while none of my father’s own children saw fit to carry on where he left off, I’m glad you have taken up the mantle, and made my dad’s legacy your heritage. I am appreciative of this, and the great love and friendship you shared with him.” (Reminiscent of an earlier written tribute to that relationship when I included Bob in the text of my father’s obituary, listing him as a God-son; for a son he definitely was).

As I walked into the funeral home yesterday to help celebrate the life of a man whom I never had the privilege of meeting, Bob greeted me at the door, and we exchanged a bit of small talk. 
Introducing me to another brother, he made him aware I was Henry’s son; the man from whom he’d purchased his business; (which by the way continues to thrive, and is lauded for the same excellent service for which my father was first known and respected).

And I responded to the introduction with,

“I’m the oldest and best looking of Henry’s three sons.”

To which Bob replied with that same wit, which I also value and emulate in my own life.

“That’s not saying much for your other brothers!”

And before I found my way into the auditorium I expressed my regrets to Bob, and reflected that,

“I always hate to see anyone leave this old world without having had the chance for a full life.” (Did I mention Roger was in his early 60’s when he left us)?

To which my friend responded,

“Oh, he definitely had a full life.” (At which point I mused that he was, at least, denied a long one).

I’d rarely seen so many people at a funeral or remembrance service. The chapel was full, and a couple dozen more were ushered into an overflow room. And as remarkable as the occasion was for its attendance, it proved just as memorable for its humor.

Did I mention the event was humorous? (Well, it was).

Just as I, at length, spoke at my own father’s memorial, Roger’s son, Blake, also memorialized him. And from my way of thinking he was nothing less than expert in the weaving of poignancy and hilarity. His first sentence was as full of comic relief and measured richness as his last.

“My dad was known for his gift of gab, and using as many words to share something brief as possible. I think by the time I finish you may accuse me of doing the same.”

(Without contradiction I can say that the young man was true to his word).

But I think his audience might have sat for another twenty minutes and more, and never complained. For he had us laughing ‘til tears rolled down our cheeks; while all the while extolling the virtues of his father.

It seems Roger, like his brother, Bob, gave as good as he got, and then some.

He was a good husband and father. He was never afraid of work. He coached Little League. He loved and supported his community. He was apt to work five days, and perform a favor or service for this or that friend or acquaintance on the weekend.

As Blake continued his diatribe, he repeated what was to become a well-worn phrase in the Edwards household; (and one which he may have occasionally wearied of hearing his father verbalize).

“You have to do the right thing simply because… it’s the right thing.”

And you might imagine that well-worn phrase caught my attention, since it is the same well-worn phrase of which I am guilty of using in my own personal and professional life.

I love that old song which words accent the virtue of loving people and lending a hand in the time of need.

If I can help somebody as I travel along.

If I can help somebody with a word or a song.

If I can help somebody from doing wrong

… then my living will not be in vain.



(Roger’s life was not lived in vain).

An afterglow of sorts was scheduled at a nearby university in which this good man’s life was to have been celebrated further, and in which friends and relatives were scheduled to share their remembrances of, and love for this fine man. I regret that other obligations prevented me from attending. I expect that event was just as poignant, and filled with as much rich hilarity as was the earlier service.

In the New Testament Book of Philippians the Apostle Paul utters a poignant two word phrase…

“Copy me.”

And any conscientious bearer of those two words does so at his own peril. For I have little doubt Providence will hold us all accountable for our words, (and subsequent actions, or the lack thereof).

Three men whose lives have not been lived in vain. Three men who have tried to do right as God gave them to see the light.

And that is not to say that any of them, (two gone on to their reward, and one remaining) were or are perfect. Far from it. But good men. Men concerned with perhaps the two greatest attributes for which they can possibly be remembered.

Their name and their word.


The tale of three men


by William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 25. Copyright Pending.

If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
********
Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.


Friday, June 23, 2017

A GOOD NAME

"But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light." (1st Peter 2:9)

Between 1915 and 1924, Henry Ford, Thomas Edison, tire magnate Harvey Firestone and naturalist John Burroughs (who took part 1916-1920), calling themselves "the Four Vagabonds," embarked on a series of summer camping trips. Others joined the group at various times, among them family, business associates and politicians, including U.S. presidents.
Even while they were in a (theoretically) incommunicado status these famous men were often mobbed by the media who published daily accounts of their travels and extolled the lavish nature of these campouts, including the presence of butlers and all manner of hired help who cooked their food and pressed their clothing.
During these "highlights of their twilight" the quartet toured the woodlands and mountains of Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, North Carolina and Maryland.
On one particular day, and as their caravan made its way from one scenic vista to another, the lead car carrying the four men broke down in some non-descript "Podunk Junction" or the other. Thankfully, a "shade tree" mechanic was located, and he set about diagnosing the problem. He finally spoke.
"Well now, I believe you have an electrical issue here."
With this, Thomas Edison exclaimed,
"Nope. I'm Thomas Edison and I've already evaluated the electrical system."
Even given the caravan which escorted the four men, the redneck mechanic was skeptical that he was in the presence of greatness. Humoring the stranger, however, he opined,
"Well then, I'm quite sure it has something to do with the fuel system."
At this point, THE automobile magnate of his day spoke up.
"Uhmmm, it's definitely not the fuel system. For you see, I'm Henry Ford, and you gotta know I already checked that out."
The good ole boy shook his head, and smiled, and cast his gaze at the bearded John Burroughs, and mused,
"And I suppose you're Santa Claus!"


Pt. 2

In early March of 2012, my father passed away. Three weeks later a memorial service was conducted at my mother's church in the idyllic town of Bartow, Florida.
During the service the minister emphacized the principle of "A Good Name," and alluded to the character of my father, and his honorable reputation among the inhabitants of this little southern town. For you see, my dad owned the only local exterminating company, and had bug-proofed hundreds and hundreds of homes in the area. Pastor Lowe went on to make an example of my nephew when he notified the audience that Tony had recently changed his surname to "McDonald;" out of love and respect for his grandfather.
My father was no Henry Ford or Thomas Edison, and hearkening back to my earlier illustration, he certainly wasn't as famous as Santa Claus, but he was known and loved by his children and grandchildren and the people of our little town.
As I was reading the 2nd chapter of 1st Peter the other day that passage with which I began this blog spoke to me in a way it never had in the past
."But you are a chosen people, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, God’s special possession, that you may declare the praises of him who called you out of darkness into his wonderful light."
God's special possession
Have you ever considered how MUCH the Creator loves you? Have you ever thought of the inestimable value with which He has endowed you?
You may not be a Thomas Edison or Henry Ford, but as a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ He has endowed you with a name and inherent value against which everything mortal and momentary pales in significance.
I love John Eldridge's quotation in the volume, "Captivating."
"You've heard that in the heart of every man, woman, boy and girl is a space that only God can fill. But did you realize in the heart of God, Himself is a space that only (insert your name) can fill."
God's special possession!


A good name, indeed!

  1. William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from (Mc)Donald's Daily Diary, Vol. 20. Copyright Pending.

    If you wish to share, copy or 'save', please include the credit line, above
    ********
    Due to a design flaw on this blogsite, if you would like to see the titles and access hundreds of my blogs from 2015 & 2016, you will need to do the following:

    Click on 2015 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "The Shot Must Choose You" appears, click on the title. All my 2015 blogs will come up in the right margin.

    Click on 2016 in the index to the right of this blog. When my December 31st blog, "Children of a Lesser God" appears, click on the title. All my 2016 blogs will come up in the right margin.

THREE JIMMIES. TWO BILLIES. ONE RICHARD


THREE JIMMIES

During the 20th century decades of the 80’s and 90’s the two most ‘famous’ (or ‘infamous’) ordained ministers of the largest Pentecostal denomination in the world

…failed morally, (and failed miserably).

It is not the purpose of this particular story to spend much time with the moral indiscretion of the one, Jim Bakker, (as I been given a more personal entre into the life and failings of the second, Jimmy Swaggart).

Suffice it to say that the former of the two was sexually involved with a church secretary, Jessica Hahn, and provided her a payoff from his television ministry funds; in order to maintain her silence. ‘Jimmy’ was also charged with fraud for having over-sold partnerships in his Heritage USA theme park vacation package, and pocketing millions of dollars of the proceeds for himself. Ultimately, Rev. Bakker was sentenced to 45 years in prison, but served only 5 of the total. Interestingly enough, the much older and the much humbled, now non-denominational minister has returned to television, and authored a book entitled, “I Was Wrong.”

As I previously inferred, the primary focus of my story today involves the ‘second Jimmy.’ (re. Jimmy Swaggart).

But to digress a wee bit.

The former events had come and gone, and the world entered has not only entered a new century, but a new Millennium. It may have been 2001 or 2002, (the exact year escapes me now) but as the staff counselor at a local church, I was involved in a second weekend outreach at another location about 20 miles from the first.

I was waiting on a counseling client one Saturday, (who apparently was a ‘no show’) and suddenly there was a knock on the door of the pastor’s office; which I used in his absence. I stood up from pastor’s desk, looked through the peep hole, and swung the door open.

Standing before me was a man of 55 or 60 wearing, as I recall, a conservative business suit.

He spoke.

“Hello, I’m Rev. Jim Reintz. Is Pastor Steverson here?”

To which I responded,

“Well, no sir. He’s not generally here on Saturdays, …unless perhaps you and he were scheduled to meet.”

I suppose the second of my sentences came across more as a question, (than a sentence).

I have long since forgotten whether he had scheduled with Pastor S., but upon reflection, it is apparent that his quest was not satisfied, as the good man of God and I proceeded to while away the next hour together.

I hadn’t heard this preacher’s name before, or at least I “hadn’t put two and two together.” It was not long, however, before I realized to whom I was speaking. Not only was this minister the former pastor of the Best Man at my wedding, and had performed his nuptial ceremony, but he had later served as the chief associate of the ‘Jimmy’ of whom the majority of this story is devoted.

Readers, unless you have been on an extended trip to a distant galaxy, or in a coma the past thirty years, (or are not yet of legal age) no doubt you are all too familiar with the misbehavior of the man I have chosen to call here, “the second Jimmy.”

But to summarize…

It seems Jimmy S. was a “loving kind of man” (as Forrest Gump might have put it) and that in the Year of our Lord 1988, (for lack of a better phrase) he “got caught with his pants down.” (Almost literally). No doubt, the (less than) devout minister had been engaged in previous trysts, but it was at this point in time, he was discovered in the arms of a prostitute. (Strangely enough, the second Jimmy had previously condemned the first Jimmy on national television for the allegations against him. Talk about “The Pot calling the Kettle black”)!

As a young man in the early 70’s, I recall having seen a few of the religious notables of my day. The flamboyant Kathryn Kuhlman held a one night crusade in Tampa which I attended. And the second Jimmy did likewise. (As I recall he added a couple of musical selections to his repertoire that evening; as he was (and is) an accomplished speaker, pianist and soloist).

But to return to my guest…

My new-found acquaintance reminded me of the events which naturally fell together after the second Jimmy was ‘discovered’ and how that he almost begged Swaggart to seek counsel after his shenanigans became known.

After having been “turned in” by another less than faithful pastor, Swaggart rendered a contrite public apology to his congregation; one which was “chuck full” of “weeping and gnashing of teeth.” The video can still be viewed on the internet today. (I admit. It is difficult to watch).

In spite of Jimmy’s heartfelt display, the (not so) good minister nay-sayed any effort to tell him what to do, and refused to comply with his denominational board’s insistence that he step down from the pulpit for an extended period of time. While Jim Reintz, (a third Jimmy, but of an entirely different caliber) assumed the senior pastorate for a short time, it wasn’t long before our second Jimmy reassumed his role in that Louisiana church and television ministry. Ultimately, the Assemblies of God defrocked ‘Rev.’ Swaggart, and he continued his ministry in a non-denominational status.

And then, hardly half a decade transpired before

…he got caught with his, (well, you know) again.

The cameras no longer pan the audience in the second Jimmy’s church. Almost thirty years after this Jimmy’s first moral indiscretion it is apparent that hundreds have drifted away from his congregation, (and no doubt thousands have left his television ministry, and subsequently his long distance tithing fold). But like the first Jimmy, he continues to “reach, teach and keep” a selected genre of believers. To be fair to my perspectives, I can only wonder why anyone would invest their trust in and continue to contribute to a ministry in which the central figure has not only yielded twice to a compromising situation, but who has refused to submit to the demands of the denomination with which he had associated himself.

Three Jimmies. Two who made choices which have followed them throughout the remainder of their lives. One who followed his moral compass and refused to be deterred from the path which God had set out before him.

As a counselor, I share a concept I refer to as “Short Term Satisfaction vs. Long Term Results,” or what might just as well be referred to as “The Scarlett O’hara Syndrome.” You may recall the movie, “Gone With The Wind.” As the film concludes Scarlett is heard to say, “I’ll just have to think about that tomorrow.”

Too many Christians and non-believers, alike are prone to make choices based on what feels good at the time; while all the while ignoring the potential long term results; not so very different from Scarlett O’hara.

Two Jimmies who seemed too well acquainted with Scarlett’s manner of thinking and course of action, and who as a result reaped shame and sorrow when ‘tomorrow’ finally arrived.

Two Jimmies on a date with the proverbial Scarlett O’hara.


TWO BILLIES


While I was born in in Dade County, the most populous of Florida’s counties, at the age of 5 my parents moved their little family to Polk County; one which vied for the former’s geographical size, but with a comparatively smaller population.

The county seat is located in the 3rd largest, (but original) city. Bartow. It was in this environment that I grew up, and experienced what I consider to have been an almost idyllic life. I attended elementary school at one of the two primary schools in our little town, and went on to attend junior high and high school at one of its two secondary schools.

I suppose the most prominent developments of the mid to late 50’s and decade of the 60’s, during which period I moved through childhood, adolescence and young adulthood, were the Vietnam War, the inauguration and subsequent assassination of President Kennedy, and the first manned lunar landing.

I recall watching a black & white television set in Mr. Ball’s 6th grade classroom as President John Kennedy took the oath of office, and just two years later having heard the dreadful news that this same man’s life was snuffed out by a lone gunman in Dallas. And there was Walter Cronkite and Huntley/Brinkley who night after night described the awful events at that time transpiring in South Vietnam; half a world away from the tranquility of my hometown. Who among us who lived, and breathed and moved at the time will ever forget Neil Armstrong’s, “One small step for man…?”

And yet, there were two local events, long since overshadowed by these more recent national and international ones, which set the spiritual tone for my little community, and (little known or appreciated by me at the time), as an individual.

For you see, exactly 30 years before yours truly was ushered into the world, and just short of four decades before I slapped the tether ball or ran the bases on my elementary playground, a momentous gathering occurred on that same dusty field. In 1919, 8,000 strong, the residents of our sleepy little town gathered there to listen to a former National League ballplayer turned evangelist. Billy Sunday. Not having been around at the time, I turned to a few archival videos to get a flavor for this good man’s preaching style. What I saw and heard did not disappoint. He could shake his fist and kick his leg with the best of them. Though born in Iowa, his tenor and accent seems almost southern. More crucially, of course, his message of sin and salvation.

And four and a half decades after Rev. Sunday graced our little community with his presence, another evangelist by the name of ‘Billy’ challenged the people of Bartow in much the same manner as his predecessor. At the time, I think there must have been some in the local area who had sat under the ministry of both Billies.

Interestingly enough, (at least to me) Rev. Graham had not committed to an Easter sunrise service that year, and a last minute inquiry by the city mayor was affirmatively received by the itinerant preacher. And even more interesting, (at least to me) the event was scheduled for an outdoor amphitheater; almost within “shouting distance” of my boyhood home. And while my mother attended that memorable Easter sunrise service, I chose to stay home. (Something I still regret to this day).

Almost a century has come and gone since Billy Sunday visited our fair city, and a full half century since the second Billy retraced his footsteps; both paradoxically having wound up in an hamlet hardly befitting their respective national notoriety. The first in a field in which I would ultimately play kickball and learn to square dance. The second, half a mile from my childhood home.

Who can know and who can say what sort of spiritual dynamic the two evangelists of the same name, almost five decades separating them, and the crowds who accompanied them, set in place in my “little neck of the woods,” and which had exercised some lingering, ethereal influence over my peers and me? At least in my mind’s eye, I can imagine the two Billies having prayed not only for those whom they could see round about them, but for them whom they could presently not see, but who would come after.

And in like fashion, I pray for those who are not yet, but who are yet to be; for my descendants, and those whom God will set along their pathway. For all the Billies (also, my own name) and Susie’s and Joseph’s and Annie’s which God has destined to live, and move and breathe, and realize impact on the same good earth.



ONE RICHARD

I was listening to my favorite radio/internet 24/7/365 broadcast this morning, “Nightsounds” with the late Bill Pearce. Interestingly enough, (at least in terms of the focus of my story) today’s program was titled, “Submission.”

And whereas, modern critics of scripture are prone to cite one of the best known biblical texts, “Wives submit yourself to your own husbands” (Ephesians 5:22), the verse which precedes it is rarely alluded to. (But I will return to that passage shortly).

Given the subject of my previous blog, (“Two Jimmies”) you might imagine I was more than a little interested when Mr. Pearce referenced the “PTL Club,” and its founder, Jim Bakker, and subsequently referred to Rev. B.’s lieutenant, and ministry president. Richard Dortch.

Of course, both Bakker and Dortch were indicted for, and determined to be guilty of federal charges of mail fraud and conspiracy; related to PTL’s fund raising strategies, including the marketing of oversold (and for all intents and purposes) non-existent vacation time shares for $1,000 “a pop.”

And perhaps more hideous and “character-killing” than the foregoing financial scandal, air-conditioned dog houses, and their exorbitant salaries was “Rev.” Bakker’s sexual encounter with church secretary, Jessica Hahn, Dortch’s approval of a quarter million dollar payoff to “keep her quiet,” and her public allegation of rape.

Ultimately, both Bakker and Dortch were forced to resign from PTL and deprived of their ministerial ordination by the Assemblies of God, and were sentenced, respectively, to 45 years and 8 years in federal prison. (However, both sentences were later overturned on appeal. The former was released after having been incarcerated for five years, and the latter after serving three).

Pt. 2

I think it is relevant to ask, what variables existed in the PTL television empire which caused it to be susceptible to this kind of behavior? I believe Richard Dortch enumerated the chief one when he later reflected, (paraphrased)

“Neither the PTL Television Network, nor the primary persons in this ministry were under submission to anyone or anything. There was no one to hold us accountable.”

And that scripture to which I alluded earlier, and which so adequately describes the good reverend’s perspective in the matter?

“Submit one to another as unto the Lord.” (Ephesians 5:21)

Richard Dortch was “called to the ministry” at the age of 15 when Oral Roberts came to town and he sat under what he would describe as his spell-binding anointing. Later, he would fulfill that calling as a pastor, and subsequently, District Superintendent of the Illinois District of the Assemblies of God. Ultimately, “Richard” labored as a missionary to Belgium, and founded a Bible school there. Of course, the presumed pinnacle of his success was his appointment as President of the PTL Television Network.

And then…

“How the mighty are fallen!”

I have often shared a concept with my clients and counseling interns.

“Character is the result of thousands of small decisions made over the course of a lifetime.”

And while I am loathe to imply the ultimate character of someone like Rev. Dortch was forever blackened by his association with, and his compromises at the PTL Television Network, there can be no doubt, whatever, that his reputation was forever sullied.

After the much maligned Rev. Dortch was released from prison, and having repented for his indiscretions, he applied for, and was restored to his previous status as an ordained minister. He went on to host a long-standing broadcast on the “Christian Television Network” called, “America’s Prayer Meeting.” Dortch also wrote and published several books on the topic of restoration.

Pt. 3

It is only recently that I reflected on the irony of having experienced the privilege of meeting and spending time with Rev. Jim Reintz, Jimmy Swaggart’s associate minister (and) having once “run into” Rev. Richard Dortch.

After his release from prison, the latter of the two took up residence in, and established his television ministry on the west coast of Florida; about 50 miles from my own “neck of the woods.” And given the good minister’s proximity, it was not altogether improbable that my wife and I momentarily happened to be in the same place at the same time as he.

Jean and I occasionally frequented a steak house in Winter Haven; (the former home of the world famous, “Cypress Gardens”). And on one particular day in the early to mid 90’s, we decided to frequent it again. Walking in, we moved through the serving line, and finding a table we sat down. Suddenly, I happened to look to my right, and immediately recognized a familiar figure; sitting alone at a table within feet of our own.

Rev. Dortch seemed lost in thought, and almost oblivious to his surroundings. He ate slowly, and it seemed he stared straight ahead; allowing me to observe him as much, and as long, as I so chose. He seemed so ‘real’ in person, and though an historical notable of our time, there was little or nothing about his presence which impressed me.

The television makeup was missing, and his hair seemed grayer than I remembered. Wrinkles lined his forehead. And while it never occurred to me at the time, I have since surmised that if I “had it to do over again” I might have stepped over to his table, introduced myself, and asked him to join us for lunch.

Afterward

Rev. Richard Dortch left us in 2011; just prior to his 80th birthday. There can be little doubt that the good he accomplished in his lifetime outweighs his momentary indiscretions. And while, (as I believe) at the end he possessed a sterling character, his reputation will be forever sullied, (as will that of his associate, Jim Bakker); as the result of their tenure at that infamous broadcast ministry.

A good man who, (unlike an associate of the Rev. Jimmy Swaggart, who refused to compromise, but challenged the immoral and unacceptable) made some very bad choices, and paid dearly for his momentary lapse in character. A man when faced with the decision to stand for the right, or fall for anything…fell for anything.

A man who, when given the choice to choose well…did not. A man who, when presented with the decision to submit to the authority of almighty God,… bowed down to the gods of arrogance, compromise and financial gain.

And yet another man, (to whom I have previously alluded) whom, when faced with similar choices, chose well…and came forth as gold.

William McDonald, PhD. Copyright 2017.













































Pt. 3

It is only recently that I reflected on the irony of having experienced the privilege of meeting and spending time with Rev. Jim Reintz, Jimmy Swaggart’s associate minister (and) having once “run into” Rev. Richard Dortch.

After his release from prison, the latter of the two took up residence in, and established his television ministry on the west coast of Florida; about 50 miles from my own “neck of the woods.” And given the good minister’s proximity, it was not altogether improbable that my wife and I momentarily happened to be in the same place at the same time as he.

Jean and I occasionally frequented a steak house in Winter Haven; (the former home of the world famous, “Cypress Gardens”). And on one particular day in the early to mid 90’s, we decided to frequent it again. Walking in, we moved through the serving line, and finding a table we sat down. Suddenly, I happened to look to my right, and immediately recognized a familiar figure; sitting alone at a table within feet of our own.

Rev. Dortch seemed lost in thought, and almost oblivious to his surroundings. He ate slowly, and it seemed he stared straight ahead; allowing me to observe him as much, and as long, as I so chose. He seemed so ‘real’ in person, and though an historical notable of our time, there was little or nothing about his presence which impressed me.

The television makeup was missing, and his hair seemed grayer than I remembered. Wrinkles lined his forehead. And while it never occurred to me at the time, I have since surmised that if I “had it to do over again” I might have stepped over to his table, introduced myself, and asked him to join us for lunch.

Afterward

Rev. Richard Dortch left us in 2011; just prior to his 80th birthday. There can be little doubt that the good he accomplished in his lifetime outweighs his momentary indiscretions. And while, (as I believe) at the end he possessed a sterling character, his reputation will be forever sullied, (as will that of his associate, Jim Bakker); as the result of their tenure at that infamous broadcast ministry.

A good man who, (unlike an associate of the Rev. Jimmy Swaggart, who refused to compromise, but challenged the immoral and unacceptable) made some very bad choices, and paid dearly for his momentary lapse in character. A man when faced with the decision to stand for the right, or fall for anything…fell for anything.

A man who, when given the choice to choose well…did not. A man who, when presented with the decision to submit to the authority of almighty God,… bowed down to the gods of arrogance, compromise and financial gain.

And yet another man, (to whom I have previously alluded) whom, when faced with similar choices, chose well…and came forth as gold.