I never
claimed that I voted for, nor that I liked DT. (I didn’t and I don’t).
To be fair,
I once wrote a blog which I titled, “I Got My Vote.” That is, because I could
not fathom casting a vote for either of the two major 2016 candidates for
President of the United States, I became my own write in candidate on my own
ballot.
(I kept
waiting for a Secret Service limo to pull up in front of my house, a
black-suited agent to ring my bell, and in his best imitation of Clint Eastwood
to say,
“President
Elect McDonald, President O. wishes to brief you on the affairs of the United
States immediately. We have a private jet waiting for you at a nearby airport,
and we are prepared to take you to the White House immediately”).
And then I
woke up.
All the
foregoing to imply that sometimes I yield to temptation, and comment on social
media (namely Facebook) political posts.
A few years
ago, I made the mistake of doing what I just described having done.
The topic of
the group post happened to be HC, and her former role as Secretary of State.
And as is the case with any group political post, a liberal or conservative
bias always exists. (In this case, the latter).
And while I
have no more use for HC, than I have for DT in the role of President of the
United States, I gave the lady a proverbial ‘thumbs up’ with the words,
“I believe
HC was a better than average Secretary of State. She exercised good judgement,
was a more than adequate role model, was well-informed, and set the standard
for excellence.”
Pt. 2
You would
have thought I murdered Mother Teresa.
Hardly two
minutes had elapsed before one of the frequent responders says,
“HC exercised
good judgement, was a good role model, and set a standard for excellence? You
gotta be kidding! How can you support such a stupid statement?”
So, I says,
“Well,
although I’m not required to explain myself to you, suffice it to say that
based on my knowledge of world events, and HC’s involvement in the same, I generally
like the way she conducted herself as Secretary of State.”
So, he says,
“Uhmmm, all
you have done is repeated what you said in the first place. You haven’t
explained why you like that woman.”
So, I says,
“Is this the
Spanish Inquisition, and are you my Chief Inquisitor? Good Golly, man. I merely
stated my opinion, (it is, after all, my First Amendment right) and you jump
down my throat!”
So, he says,
“You’re the
one who claimed HC was a good Secretary of State. I’m just giving you a chance
to prove it. And so far, you ain’t doing a very good job.”
So, I says,
“I’m sorry I
responded to this post in the first place. And I’m sorry there are people like
you who frequent social media, and can’t tolerate responses which don’t agree
with their pet peeves and political viewpoints.”
Afterward
Remind me to
avoid wasting my time responding to political posts on social media
If and when
I break the first rule, remind me not to debate people who insist that I
explain myself to them
If and when
I begin to debate people on a social media political post, remind me to cease
and desist, as quickly as I realize I am doing so
Remind me
not to post political posts on social media
If and when
I break the fourth rule, remind me not to debate those who respond to my
political posts on social media
Remind me to
treat people, not as people treat me, but as I wish to be treated.
(Hmmm, sounds a lot like a passage of
scripture).
By William McDonald, PhD. Excerpt from "(Mc)Donald's Daily Diary" Vol. 81. Copyright pending
If you wish to copy, share or save this blog, please include the credit line, above
No comments:
Post a Comment